Print this page

Billions flow from term accounts

posted by Simon Moynihan Jan 28, 2011 at 00:00 in Personal Finance

Moneybag

And how the banks are fighting back

We all know that most of our banks are broke and desperate for deposits. They’ll take anything we’ve got, but the deposits they covet most of all are fixed terms. These are the accounts where you agree to lock your money away for a set period of time in return for a higher rate of interest, and Irish banks are now hawking these products with great enthusiasm.

Term deposits are a pretty good indicator of a population’s faith in its banking system. If people think everything’s hunky-dory, and believe that the banks will still be there in ten years, they’ll happily open accounts that lock their cash away for 18 months, two years, or heck, maybe even five years. If people don’t have faith in the banking system, they keep their cash where they can get their hands on it… quickly.

Unsurprisingly, the amount of money in term deposit accounts has been falling steadily over the last couple of years, and September 2008 was the big month when it all began to go pear-shaped. Back then Anglo was hemorrhaging a billion a day to international investors, the deposit guarantee was increased to €100,000, the banks took their begging bowls to the government on September 29th and the infamous blanket guarantee was issued on September 30th. Thus began the “cheapest bailout in history.”

The money in term accounts has charted the rise and fall of Irish banking perfectly. In the two years from September 2006 to September 2008, while we were still riding high on the Tiger’s back, the amount of money in term accounts went from €60 billion to €89 billion. A massive increase of 48%.

Then in September 2008 people stopped putting their money into term accounts and the slide began. By November 2010, the amount of money we had in these accounts had fallen back down to €62 billion.* On a chart it looks like a pyramid peaking in September 2008.
 


Value of Irish Term Accounts - Sept 2006 - Nov 2010


The steady flow of cash out of term accounts showed that people had less than total faith in the banks and even less in the government. Despite the guarantees, people wanted their money where they could get at it quickly and as terms matured, customers moved their money into demand and notice accounts rather than rolling over into new terms.

So now the banks are trying to persuade us to put our money back into these kinds of accounts with slick advertising, shiny new accounts and sparkly interest rates. Whether we’ll be encouraged to lock away our cash is yet to be seen, but the accounts are worth a look all the same.

When advertising any kind of savings account, banks have to publish what’s called the Annual Equivalent Rate or AER. It’s seems odd that banks should be required to show the actual yearly interest rate for a savings account so as not to confuse consumers, but it makes sense when looking at term accounts.

Term accounts differ form standard savings accounts in that the terms can be anything from a couple of months to 10 years, and when they have terms of more than a year, banks love to advertise the term rate in huge numbers and keep the AER in the small print.

There are loads of examples of this but since Bank of Ireland brought out some new term accounts this month, it’s worth taking a look at them first. They have a new 18-month account and a new 15-month account. With both, they lead with the amount of interest you’d earn by the end of the term. Their promotional copy look like this:

Get a higher return with our 18 month deposit – 4.50%

Introducing our 15 month online fixed term deposit – 4.25%

For both of these accounts the end of term rate is in huge numbers and the AER is of course in tiny type.

Conversely, Bank of Ireland has a new 6-month term account which is advertised as having a:

Fantastic rate of 3.43% EAR

The return is actually 1.7% but of course BOI doesn’t lead with that when it can use the higher AER figure.

With these three accounts, it looks like the 18-month will earn the most interest doesn’t it? Well, it won’t. The account with the best return is actually the 6-month, followed by the 15-month and the lowest yielding account is the 18-month. So Bank of Ireland is turning the concept of the term account upside-down and paying out the highest rate to the shortest term.

Bank of Ireland are not alone in this though. EBS recently pushed a 15-month term account with a headline return of 4.4% and an 18-month term account with a return of 4.75%. Again, the actual interest rate for the 15-month is better than the 18-month so savers would be better off with the shorter term.

Despite the way these kinds of accounts are being advertised, they all represent big increases in how much the banks are prepared to pay us for our money. The 6-month Bank of Ireland account is the best 6-month term in the market, and EBS has a 1-year term, that at 3.5% AER is only matched by Anglo and Irish Nationwide – hardly the banks of choice for the nervous saver.

It will be interesting to see if customers come back to saving their money in term accounts and whether this push by the banks stops the slide. With so much uncertainty, it’s pretty unlikely… unless the population suddenly develops guts of steel.

*******

2nd Feb 2011 - The latest Central Bank figures have just come out and in December the amount in term accounts fell by almost €5 billion to €57.721 billion. This represents one of the largest single monthly drops in the last two years and should not be entirely attributed to seasonal factors. The the fall in value for December over the last three years was has been €2 billion or less and there was practically no change in December 2006. 

 

*Numbers used are from the Central Bank's statistics for Irish Private Sector Deposits. Accounts referenced are term deposit accounts with agreed maturity of up to 2 years. Actual figures are: September 2006 - €60,527 million, September 2008 - €89,328 million, November 2010 - €62,524.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Answer_generic
0
1
Flagoff
thomasdouglas

Feb 11, 2011 at 17:03

I had attended a semenar for permenant tsb some two monthsago & was informed that there was some 140 billion in irish bank savings & they.tsb.did not require a bailout.is this true? & why can savers not lend to the irish government at a better rate,which would be below the imf ,ecb, rate charged to ireland.
Answer_generic
0
1
Flagoff
Donncha

Feb 14, 2011 at 14:26

thomasdouglas, I presume the 140 billion includes on-demand and notice accounts in addtion to the 57 billion in term deposits mentioned by Simon in the postscript to his article. That is correct about Permanent TSB - it has not taken any injections of capital from the Government, unlike other domestic institutions. And savers can indeed lend to the Irish Government - see www.statesavings.ie.
Simon_expert
0
1
Flagoff
Simon Moynihan

Feb 14, 2011 at 15:12

There is a huge amount of money on deposit with Irish financial institutions. At last count, the Irish private sector had €168 billion on deposit, with Irish households accounting for almost €95 billion of that. The €168 billion figure is across all account types and the amount of private sector money on deposit in Ireland regardless of account type has been falling. Down over €15 billion or 7.6% in the last year alone. ---- Thomas, your point about lending to the government at a better rae is a good one, and the government is trying to attract some of this money with products like the National Solidarity Bond. However, they banks need to achieve and maintain a liquidity ration of 12% (meaning they must have €1 on deposit for every €8 they have out on loan). It also looks like this ratio will be reviewed upwards by the ECB in the coming months as a condition of the bailout/loan. This will make it even more difficult for banks to lend money and make them desparate to hold on to their deposits.---- As for Permo, I can't speak to their statement that they don't need a bailout, but in the last couple of weeks they announced that they are axing 300 jobs which is a fifth of their workforce. They have also increased mortgage inteest rates again. And in spectacular fashion, they have hiked their five year fixed rate from 5.75% to 8.75%. By doing this they are basically saying that they don't want new mortgage business and don't want their existing customers to be able to fix.
Related articles
Newsletter
Daily Deals, New Product categories and the latest news straight to your mailbox
Newsletter_signup